高强铝合金T形接头缺陷超声TOFD检测

Ultrasonic TOFD detection of defects in T-joints of high-strength aluminum alloy

  • 摘要:
    目的 针对现有无损检测方法对高强铝合金T形接头焊接结构缺陷检测可靠性低这一问题,开展高强铝合金T形接头焊接结构缺陷超声衍射时差法(Time of flight diffraction, TOFD)检测研究,旨在改善当前T形接头无损检测现状,并为其有效检测提供技术支持。
    方法 进行了人工缺陷检测试验及焊接缺陷检测试验,基于试验的TOFD A扫描、TOFD D扫描及TOFD B扫描结果,分析了超声波在T形接头中的传播特点,计算了缺陷的位置,并阐明了超声探头间距对缺陷位置的测量误差的影响,以减小T形接头中焊趾信号对缺陷的衍射信号的干扰。
    结果 研究结果表明,超声TOFD法可以检测出高强铝合金T形接头腹板焊趾和翼板焊趾中的缺陷。在实际焊缝中,由于焊趾形状不规则,若探头间距过大,焊趾的信号波对信号判断识别的影响更大,甚至将导致无法分辨缺陷衍射波。
    结论 在保证超声波声场能覆盖整个焊缝的前提下,应该采用尽量小的超声探头间距,提高缺陷的可识别性及定位计算的精度。人工缺陷的平均测量误差为0.5 mm,焊缝缺陷的平均测量误差为1.5 mm。

     

    Abstract: Objective In view of the low reliability of the existing non-destructive testing methods for defects detection in T-joints structure of high-strength aluminum alloy, the technique ultrasonic TOFD (Time of flight diffraction) is employed and studied. The research work aims to improve the current status of non-destructive testing of weld defects for T-joints and provide effective technical support for its quality evaluation. Methods Experiments on artificial defect detection and welding defect detection are conducted. Based on the experimental results of TOFD A-scan, TOFD D-scan, and TOFD B-scan, propagation characteristics of ultrasonic waves in T-joints are analyzed and position of the defects is calculated. The impact of probe spacing measurement error of defect positions is clarified to reduce the interference of toe signals on the diffracted signals from defects in T-joints. Results The research results indicate that ultrasonic TOFD method can detect defects in web weld toes and flange weld toes from T-joints of high-strength aluminum alloy. In the actual welds, due to irregular shape of weld toe, if spacing between probes is too large, signal wave from weld toe will have a greater impact on judgment and identification of signals, potentially even rendering it impossible to distinguish defect diffraction waves. Conclusion Provided that ultrasonic field can cover the entire weld, probe spacing should be minimized to enhance defect recognizability and improve accuracy of positioning calculations. The average measurement error for artificial defects is 0.5 mm, and the average measurement error for weld defects is 1.5 mm.

     

/

返回文章
返回