Citation: | Liu Jiaqi, Xue Zhengrong, Chen Shuqiang, et al. Influence of different welding methods on mechanical properties and microstructure of laser welded joints of ultra-high strength armored steel[J]. Welding & Joining, 2024(3):71 − 75, 80. DOI: 10.12073/j.hj.20221122001 |
Austenitic and ferritic stainless steel welding wires are often used in MAG process of armored steel, which greatly reduces tensile strength and hardness of welded joints, meanwhile, causes local softening of heat-affected zone, and reduces protective performance of armored vehicles. In order to meet strength and hardness protection requirements of welded joints with ultra-high strength armored steel, laser welding process of ultra-high strength armored steel was studied in this paper, which included four welding methods, MAG, laser self-fusion welding, laser wire filler welding and laser-arc hybrid welding. Performance indicators of tensile, bending and hardness of welded joints and microstructure of welded joints were studied. The result showed that weld of laser welded joints was composed of coarse lath martensite, and microstructure of MAG weld was made up of ferrite and granular bainite. For laser welding and MAG, quenched coarse grain zone was composed of both coarse acicular martensite, quenched fine-grain zone was made up of fine acicular martensite, and incomplete quenched zone consisted of mixed microstructure of martensite and ferrite. Tensile strength and hardness of laser welded joints were much higher than those of MAG joints. Tensile strength of laser welded joints could reach more than 90% of base metal, and hardness was about 82% of base metal, which greatly improved safety of protective vehicle. However, bending strength of laser welded joints was lower than that of MAG joints. Regardless of face bending or back bending, bending samples of laser welding usually were broken when bending angle was between 10°~30°, which was much lower than bending angle 90° (not broken) of bending samples of MAG, thus limited its usage scenarios.
[1] |
黄俊, 翟紫阳, 王克鸿, 等. 616装甲钢厚板结构件多层多道焊数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(11): 89 − 93.
|
[2] |
夏浩, 黄俊, 周琦, 等. 616装甲钢复合热源搅拌摩擦焊工艺[J]. 焊接学报, 2017, 38(11): 124 − 128.
|
[3] |
董文超, 陆善平, 李殿中. 焊接顺序对大型薄板装甲钢结构焊接变形的影响[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(7): 43 − 46, 50.
|
[4] |
朱亮, 陈剑虹. 热影响区软化焊接接头的强度及变形[J]. 焊接学报, 2004, 25(2): 61 − 65.
|
[5] |
张海军, 李潭, 王晶琦, 等. 防护型车用超高强钢的焊接性及焊接工艺[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2017, 29(4): 323 − 328.
|
[6] |
董现春, 张楠, 陈延清, 等. 高Ti, Nb析出强化高强钢接头强度及焊接热影响区软化行为分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2012, 33(11): 72 − 76.
|
[7] |
朱晓莹, 谭伟, 赵阳. 装甲钢CO2气体保护焊焊接接头组织和抗裂性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2007, 28(7): 94 − 96.
|
[8] |
李世康, 童金钟, 韩红彪, 等. 光纤激光工艺参数对Q235钢穿透点焊缝形状和尺寸的影响[J]. 焊接, 2023(2): 1 − 7.
|
[9] |
夏佩云, 封小松, 王春明, 等. 激光摆动焊接工艺参数对不锈钢焊缝成形与气孔率的影响[J]. 焊接学报, 2023, 44(4): 39 − 44.
|
[10] |
Jiang Ning, Chen Lei, Wang Chuanyang. Optimizing process of laser transmission welding of thermoplastics through RSM[J]. China Welding, 2017, 26(3): 21 − 27.
|
[11] |
Kah P. Overview of the exploration status of laser-arc hybrid welding processes[J]. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 2012, 30(2): 112 − 132.
|
[12] |
蔡志海, 秦航, 何嘉武, 等. 激光‒电弧复合焊接高强钢显微组织与力学性能[J]. 装甲兵工程学院学报, 2017, 31(5): 91 − 96.
|
[13] |
徐良, 雷振, 杨海锋, 等. 激光‒电弧复合焊接头根部特性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2019, 40(3): 76 − 79.
|
[14] |
陆斌锋, 芦凤桂, 唐新华, 等. 激光焊接工艺的现状与进展[J]. 焊接, 2008(4): 53 − 57.
|
[15] |
董现春, 潘辉, 赵阳, 等. 防弹钢板激光焊接接头的组织和性能[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2019, 40(9): 163 − 168.
|